Archive for September, 2006

Trotskyites, 9-11, the “War on Terror”, The Demonization of America and the Reasons Behind it All

September 8, 2006

We all know about the darker side of the war in Iraq and the War on terror in general, the secret detentions, the “phantrom flights” of prisoners to torture promoting countries, “our” own “waterboarding” and other torture techniques and the Depleted Uranium “we” spread all over Iraq and Afghanistan. Now the question that needs answered if we are to remain a TRUELY free Republic and NOT the one that bots like JimRob support when they userp that name is simplyt WHY. Why is America engaged in doing things that essentially DEMONIZE its very existance throughout the world. Basically the answers so far have been:

1. It is a war for oil.

2. It is a war for Israel in which we are acting as proxies for the Jewish state.

3. (The official NeoCon/bot answer) It is a “clash of civilizations” between a modern “christian” democratic secularism and a medieval fundamentalist religion using terror in order to convert the world population ot its version of the Islamic faith.

But are ANY of these the real reason for the war. In this 00-Hotherp report we will be looking at a possible fourth reason for the war. This that the DEMONIZATION OF AMERICA is its soul and ONLY purpose. You see, for the past decades much as Switzerland and its relatively free gun and property ownweship has been a thorn in the side of building a Socialist “One Europe” in the truest sense of the word, America and its relatively free gun and property ownership has been a thorn in the side of the One World Movement for turning the United Nations or some similar future entity into a ONE WORLD SOCIALIST SUPERSTATE.

To further understand why the chickenhawks/NeoCons may be prosecuting this war purely for the demonization of America one must also realize where they came from. Because the Neo-Cons call themselves “Conservatives” people generally believe that they come from the “right” side of the political spectrum. Nothing could be further from the truth. The NeoCons in fact have their origins in the early days of the post Lenin Soviet Union. At this time Joseph Stalin and one of the older commies, Leon Trotsky were vying for the total power of the Soviet state and these two had radically differing methods od attempting to spread it through out the world and perpetuating its terror domestically on the Soviet Population.

Basically Stalin’s method of terror and power consolidation was massive spying and assassination abroad and a and the GULAG or a simple Nagant “gas seal” revolver to the back of the neck in secret in the soviet state itself. Trotsky’s however was total perpetual revolutionary war on all fronts both foreign and domestic. Indeed it was Trotsky who was the archetect of the idea of a perpetual “clash of civilizations” (In his case Secular Capitalism against Soviet Communism) as the means for generating the perpetual police “security state”. Perpetual warfare in Trotsky’s mind was the ONLY way that Socialism/Communism could be mantained. Probably because he knew that with the lack of some kind of “emergency” to justify state monopoly ownership of property and weapons, and totalitarianism peoples’ thinking will always tend toward religious belief, freedom and private ownership of property.

While Trotsky was killed by minions of Stalin in Mexico in 1940 when Stalin was consolidating his power in his infamous “purges” Trotsky’s spirit continued on in the Universities of America where he eventually became the idol of the more violent arm of the “Hippie”/”Yippie” movement of the late 1960s and early 1970s. Gradually as these Trotskyite “hippies” grew up they began to embrace the market economy and SOCIALIZE it with such devices as continuing the NWO generated trend of Copyright and Patent from the temporary incentive for inventors, artists and authors invisioned by America’s founders to the European idea of “permanent intellectual property” and other socialist regulations. Eventually the Trotskyites began to call themselves “Neo-Conservatives” basically meaning that they were new to market economy concepts having been outright Trotskyite commies douring their University educations. They also joined the mainstream NWO and its core American organizations of the TriLateral Commission, Council on Foreign relaions, Bohemian Grove and the like.

A document and organization called the Project for a New American Century (PNAC) became the manefesto of the new Market Economy Trotskyism that basically traded Communism for an Internationalist form of Fascism and applied Trotsky’s Perpetual War, “Clash of Civilizations” and security state ideas to imposing their new brand of Socialism worldwide using the American military.

The older branch of the American NWO however saw a different reason to support the Neo-Cons. The United States of America has long been a thorn in the sides of the NWO because especially the “Heartland” Americans of the South and the West would not surrender their sovregnty, firearms, lands and their old patriotic symbols (like the Confederate Battle Flag in the South) to the NWO. Before 9-11 the NWO tried many schems and traps to get “Heartland” Americans to surrender to them such as Radical Environmentalism (The Klamath Vally water fiasco that was the main Shrubya oriented story before 9-11 was a classic NWO land grab attempt disguised as environmental protection and the resistance to the Klamath Valley people to it was probably the final thing that would lead to 9-11 and the rise of a Trotskyite “security state” against any further resisters of land grabs who would not use the power of Jury Nullification or the gun if it became necessary in that resistance.)

In the mind of the more Elite NWO players of the old Rockefeller and related NWO American bloodlines and their “allies” in the Jesuit Order of the Roman Church the “Heartlanders” of America and the United States itself had to be “demonized” in the rest of the world in order to finally get the United States out of the way of developing a One World Government. Their plan for doing this which we generally call 9-11 today was simple:

1. Get “Heartland” America to elect someone for the American President who was not very intellegent, allied with the NWO and the Neo-Cons and most importantly appearantly one of the Heartlanders themselves who would either through lack of intellegence, being a “true believer” in the Neo-Con/Trotsky “Clash of Civilizations/Security State” doctines or both would implement the PNAC manefesto as President.

2. Create PNACs “New Pearl Harbor” by blowing up their own buildings (The world trade Centers in this case) in a controlled demolition while crashing supposedly hijacked aircraft into them thereby getting Americans to support PNAC’s perpetual war with the Islamic world and thereby demonizing America and especially the pro gun, pro private property, pro free enterprise, pro Constitution “Heartland” Americans who still are the ONE MAJOR ROADBLOCK to One Worldism. (I wouldn’t set foot in ANY skyscraper whose origins are with a “New World Order” bloodline. I believe they are ALL loaded with conrolled demolition bombs from day one of their construction.)

3. Finally the One Worlders would come up with their usual solution, ONE WORLD SOCIALISM as being the only answer to nations like the demonized America starting wars and more people of the world would perobably swallow it EVEN INCLUDING AMERICANS than ever before. (This “solution” is being publically pushed mainly by Hugo Chavez in Venzualia now as hust simply another Illuminati/Jesuit Order dog andd pony show.)

Now comes the SECOND shocker of this story. Many of us Patriots think we are immune to the lies of the Electric Jesuit in our living rooms. (For those of you who call the Electric Jesuit the Electric Jew bear with me for a moment and I’ll show you how it can be BOTH.) Are we really???!!!!! As a forinstance of what I’m talking about a mere TEN YEARS AGO Patriots would have NEVER admired an outright Socalist like Venezualia’s Hugo Chavez. (And some Patriots who hold to the original conspiratorial theory of history and realize that ALL brands of Socialism originate with the New World Order still don’t.) I believe that with this new energing admiration of SOCIALISTS we Patriots have fallen for the Electric Jesuit using NEGATIVE publicity to get “undergog” support for them just as much as the BOTS have with their admiration for Shrubya being POSITIVELY re inforced by the Electric Jesuit.

Before going further I promised to show some of you how the Television can be BOTH an Electric Jesuit and an Electric Jew. The secret to this duo identity for your television set lies in The Extreme Oath of Induction of the Jesuit order. This oath consists of several parts, some given by the a Superior and the others taken by the candidate for full elevation in the Jesuit order. This part given by the Superior is the secret to your television’s duo electric identity:


My son, heretofore you have been taught to act the dissembler: among Roman Catholics to be a Roman Catholic, and to be a spy even among your own brethren; to believe no man, to trust no man. Among the Reformers, to be a Reformer; among the Huguenots, to be a Huguenot; among the Calvinists, to be a Calvinist; among other Protestants, generally to be a Protestant; and obtaining their confidence, to seek even to preach from their pulpits, and to denounce with all the vehemence in your nature our Holy Religion and the Pope; and even to descend so low as to become a Jew among Jews, that you might be enabled to gather together all information for the benefit of your Order as a faithful soldier of the Pope.


One ironic thing about this is the probable founder of the New World Order from which ALL forms of Socialism sprang was himself both a Jew and a Jesuit in line with the emboldened part of this part of the Jesuit Extreme Oath of Induction. His name was Adam Weishaupt. Despite his vaunted Communist “atheism” Trotsky too was believed to have ties with the Jesuit order while also being a Jew. Jesuits are also to be found in virtually ALL Socialist movements today probably including the Neo-Cons.

The main reason I wrote this is that there is a movement afoot to tie the Patriot movement into an entangling alliance with so called “Independent Leftists” like those who run CounterPunch, DailyKos and similar ourtfits. THERE ARE NO INDEPENDENT SOCIALISTS. The Communists, The Socialists, The Fascists, the NAZIs, the “Progressives” the “Liberals”, The Neo-Cons, the Moderate “Conservatives and all the rest that advocate government intervention in the matters of firearms ownership, REAL property ownership (“Intellectual Property” should be returned to what the Founders intended), travel, money and religion have their origins with Adam Weishaupt, The Rothchild/Rockefeller bankers and the Jesuit Order. There is nothing to be admired, emulated or allied with in ANY of that.

Therefore as much as we may not like certain things America is doing under the control of the current crop of New World Order Minions called “Neo-Cons” we should NOT follow the course of demonizing, renouncing or leaving her as many, even PATRIOTS are advocating these days. Rather we should get ready to defend her true treasures, her constitution and her unique system of INDIVIDUAL rights from the coming time of trouble for her created by the NWO on 9-11. In the final anyalisis this ammounts to the folowing statement when the minions of the New World JESUIT Order come to take your guns and eventually YOU away. USE EM OR LOSE EM!!! No matter what you think there will be NO refuge in demonizing Amrerica from Hugo Chavez’s Venezualia. CHAVEZ’S VENEZUALIA IS AS MUCH A PART OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER AS IS SHRUBYA’S AMERICA!! The supposed rivalry between the two branches of Socialism involved is just another put up job from the Electric Jesuit.

Then what can we do about this you may ask: once again simple:

1. Patriots MUST get back to demonizing the doctrine of SOCIALISM no matter what deceptive form it may take. The reason many sheeple are sheeple is that they simply don’t understand that the SOCIALIST New World Order comes in many flavors and the Neo-Cons currently in power in America and the Hugo Chavez “Bolivarians” are simply new “flavors” of the same old NWO.

2. Comes directly from above. The sheeple MUST be educated on exactly what Socialism is and by this I DON’T mean the theories of Karl Marx, Adam Weishaupt, Hillary, Shrubya, Hugo Chavez or any other particular Socialist, I mean the TRUTH about what Socialism IS, a movement to takes their religion, Individual Identity, houses, lands, guns, cars, children, pets, gold and silver heirlooms, bank accounts and everything else they hold dear and give it to the elitists of a One World State to supposidly divvy up amongst the poor while they ACTUALLY KEEP IT ALL FOR THEMSELVES. The sheeple must be shown how Socialism will affect them WHERE THEY LIVE and not just theory that they won’t understand if they are to quit being sheeple and turn against it.

3. Rather than trying to avoid it we should think of jury duty summonses as an OPPERTUNITY for the Jury NULLIFICATION of already existing Socialist and other NWO originated “laws” like Permanent Copyright, Gun Control, anti gold and silver Legal tender laws, travel restriction laws, income and property taxation laws and the like. A jury deliberation room may also be a good place for educating some of the sheeple that will be your fellow Jurors in these matters.

4. While we can demonize the Neo-Cons or other NWO Socialists running America we should NEVER demonize America herself. America with her private guns and remaining Individulistic citizens who can educate sheeple OUT of the sheeple status and back into the ways of individual freedom is still the ONE MAJOR ROADBLOCK to the New World Order gaining their One World Superstate even though she doesn’t look like such now under Presidents like Clintoon and Shrubya. And besides as the beginning of this article states the demonization of America was EXACTLY what the NWO wanted when THEY sent her to war in Iraq and Afghistan with their 9-11 plot.

Liberalism, “Neo-Con” Conservatism, Randian Objectivism, Anarchism and Illuminism, Why They Are So Much Alike.

September 8, 2006

In this 00-Hotherp report we will be looking at the political philosophies of today and asking the question, Why are they so much alike despite their appearant differences. First let’s look at these philosophies.

1. Liberalism –> This is actually a stolen name applied to British style Fabian Socialism. The basic theory behind modern Liberalism as proposed by people like Bill and Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, Joseph Biden and Edward Kennedy is to build up a state based on old Marxist Leninist principles GRADUALLY through a process of introducing graduated taxation, gun control, socialized medicine, state property ownership and other aspects of Socialism/Communism in small gradual pieces.

2. “Neo-Con” Conservatism –> Basically another form of socialism based on the ideas of Communist Leon Trotsky and Itialian Fascist Leader Benito Mussalini. Neo-Cons basically seek Socialism Mussalini style by merging the state with the most powerful business Corporations to form a Socialist entitiy where the state itself handles “security” (Torture, Prisons, Concentration Camps, etc) but Corporate executives rather than being eliminated continue to serve as managers of the general economy. Because they believe in the permanent state of war ideas of both Trotsky and Mussalini Neo-Cons are highly likely to engage in militarty adeventures to spread their version of “democracy” (“Elected” Fascist socialism).

3. Randian Objectivism –> The third political player is the philosophy of unhindered Capitalism proposed by Ayn Rand in her many novels. It was also the original guiding philosophy of the Libertarian Party when it first began. While it looks good on paper in the real world there is nothing in the Randian form of Libertarianism to act as a counterbalance to huge monopoly corporations becoming mini totalitarian states in their own right with the power of life and death over their “customers” and “employees” without national borders.

4. Anarchism –> This is actually an oxymoron, essentially an attempt to run a socialist state without a state. In the real world however any Anarchist Socialist “voluntary association” will eventually take on the roll of a genuine state and make participation therein life or death MANDATORY.

As you can see all four of the basic offerings on today’s American political tree are in fact very much alike in that all of them promise a restoration of freedom but in fact are totalitarian at a root level. Why is this. To look at this we must go back in history to the American and French Revolutions and there we will find the father of ALL of the modern political philosophies.

The American Revolution, Deists and Christians

Basically there ware two Religious philosophies behind the American Revolution, Protestent Christianity and Deism. While Deism was much more liberal in its doctrine than Christianity BOTH of these philosophys began with the idea of a Creator God and a fixed moral law dirived from that God that applied equally to the state, buisiness organizations and individuals. The basic difference between the two was that Christianity saw the WHOLE Holy Bible as being the basis of that fixed moral law while Deists generally saw human reason acting within the 10 Commandments alone as its basis. However both philosophies developed the idea that humans were endowed with individual rights and responsibilities that could not be taken away by the state or buisness organizations because doing so would violate the basic moral law dirived from GOD. It is from the basic philosophy of BOTH Christianity and Deism that we get the first ten amendments to the Constitution, the Constitutional requirement that legal money be gold and silver coin, and the strict limititation of copyright and patent terms that says that ideas that were still seen as basically given to their authors and inventors by God had to be given over to the public domain after a reasonable profit generating period but still within the lifetimes of their authors/discoverers.

The French Revolution and Illuminism

Like the American Revolution the French Revolution of 1789 began is a basically Deistic movement based on fixed moral law and human reason acting within it. However there was another force that was recently kicked out of Germany involved in the French Revolution. Illuminism. Illuminism was Neither Deistic or Christian in its form but was ATHEISTIC publically and SATANIC in many of its closed rituals. In keeping with its public Atheism Illuminsism which came to be known in France and America as Jacobinism has always tried to promote an origin story of gradual totally materialistic development of the universe. It was left to Jacobin “scientist” Jean Jaques Lamark to try to first introduce this theory of “Evolution” to scientific credibility
so that could replace the GOD based creation story held by both Deists and Christians. There were three basic reasons why
“Evolution” had to replace any notion of Creation in the Jacoban scheme of things.

1. By saying man was nothing more than a glorified animal it excused man acting as an animal towards his fellow man thereby excusing free sex and state theft upheld by force and torture and other animal like behaviors in the part of the citizenry.

2. It promoted the idea that there was no afterlife and therefore allowed the Jacoban state to enhance the fear of death and control it for their own purposes.

3. It promoted the idea that State leaders were the “Evolutionary Superiors” of their subjects and had the inherant right to of life and death over them “granted” by that “superiority.

Therefore once Illuminism/Jacobinism replaced Deism as the basis of the French Revolution the Reign of Terror spacifically against Royalty and Aristocrats became one against the citizenry in general that the Jacobins came to call Depopulation where mass drownings and skull crusings wutn hoes, clubs and other implements accompanied the gillotine in the ever increasing orgy of mass murder that spent itself completely ONLY with the Napoleonic Wars and in fact took many of the Jacobin Illuminists including their leader Maxamilian Robespere with it.

In fact so concerned were the Iluminist Jacobins with eliminating anything religious in their Illuminist State of “Republican” France that they even tried to eliminate the sabbaths of the various religions with a new “Revolutionary” calender based on “naturalistic” names for the months with four 10 day weeks in each month with an end of the year festival of 5 days in an normal year and 6 in a leap year replacing Christmas.

The thing other than Napoleon that probably killed off Jacobin Illuminism and drove it underground until the 19th century was probably the falsification of Lamark’s theory of “Evolution”. Like most of the early evolutionists Lamark was not a genuine scientist and made a very serious mistake in his theory by ascribing “Evolution” to accidents that happened to animals like a loss of a tial or a stretching of the neck in ADULTHOOD. (In Lamark’s theory a hamster was simply a descendent of a mouse that lost its tail and got fatter than a normal mouse as a forinstance.) Experements by genuine scientists in cutting the tails of mice and fattening them up basically showed that their offspring REMAINED fully tailed normal weight mice without any of the artificial “hamster” features and thereby falsified the Lamarkian theory that changes in adulthood led to “Evolution” in offspring. Without Lamarkism people who wanted a “non dogmatic” philosophy of origins had to go back to the creation story as defined by Desim as the Atheism of the Jacoban Illuminists was denied its “scientific” cover.

However Illuminism was far from dead. One of the many wealthy families to take it up was the Rothschild family, the masters of the Central Banking systems of England and Napoleonic France. At this time their predominint non banking power base was the British East India company which functiond much like the TriLateral Commission, The Bilderburgs and the Council On Foreign Relations does today. It would be the British East India Company that would finally bring about a version of “Evolution” that could not be falsified at the time through a “Scientist” whose ONLY degree was for the Ministry in the Christian Religion he Rejected, Charles Darwin and would bring back Political Jacobin Illuminism under tha name “Communism” through its own member Fredric Engels and his “outside” paid off political ho Karl Marx.

Basically Darwin’s theory differed from Lamark’s mainly in the stage of development where “Evolution” was perceived to occur.
Rather than saying it occured in the adulthood of an organism Darwin made changes in the embryo of an organism that he called
“gemules” but today are called mutations the basis of Evolution. Darwin also added another aspect to “Evolution” that has its origins in the revised Illuminism of the British East India Company. This was the “dialectical” or “Ordo ab Chao” interpretation of philosophy and scientific theory. Basically the dialect of Darwinism is organisms (thesis) interact with the envoronment (antithesis) and produce organisms fit to survive the environment (synthesis). While this idea of “Dialectical Materialism” would be made more famous by British East India Company member Fredric Engels and his paid political ho Karl Marx
as the basis of the revival of political Illuminaism under the names of “Communism” and “Socialism” it was actually Darwin that made “dialectical materialism” the basis of a second rejection of God as father of individual rights and responsibilities through a Godless origin story sold as “scientific fact”. It was this that allowed the revival of the Illuminist philosophy by Engels\Marx.

Now enough of history for now we should have found out why today’s political philosophies are so much alike in promising freedom but delivering TOTALITARIANISM in one form or another, Either through Corporations, the state or through psudo “voluntary” organizations. ALL MODERN POLITICAL PHILOSOPHIES ARE ESSENTIALLY JACOBIN/ILLUMINIST and reject GOD as the source of individual rights and responsibilities within a fixed moral framework. ALL of them are to one degree or another based on the Atheist “dialectical materiialism” theory first made public by Charles Darwin as part of his theory of “Evolution” and brought into politics and economics by Engels, Marx, Mussalini, Hitler and others to be eventually refined into the Liberals, Neo-Cons, Randians, and Leftist Anarchists of today.