This installment of the Bites starts my new policy of serving them up from the WordPress Blogging site rather than posting them directly to a forum. I hope you will enjoy the new system.
This week the bites are also pretty generalized with bites going to the Philosophy of Corporatism for its attacks on genuine constitutional Free Enterprise, Public Education for its use of drugs like Ritalin and demeaning punishments to sheepleize students and Shrubya Bush and Dick Cheney share one for their attitudes toward the Constitution and military solutions to NWO creation up to and including possible Martial law. As usually the WORST of www.gunguys.com rounds out the week’s festivities.
As always remember the KEY and enjoy!
——————————————————————————————————–
Bite One > Corporatism


Since the fall of the Soviet Union a new form of totalitarianism known as Globalist Corporatism has taken over as the main threat to Constitutional Republics and Individual Freedom. Multinational Corporations in recent times have been the main forces behind
such now efforts as “Gun Control”, the North American Union and depopulation. In addition the Philosophy of Corporatism that the corporate elite has an inherent right to “own” everything has led to Unconstitutional extensions of copyright and patent privileges that have virtually choked off the public domain at the year 1922 in America and the situation in the Copyright/Patent area is even WORSE in many other nations that stop the public domain in the late 19th century. Even many nations that call themselves SOCIALIST have redefined their Copyright/Patent laws to fit the “we own EVERYTHING” philosophy of Corporatism.
The Corporatism that parades around as “Free Enterprise” these days also has had other detramental effects on our basic individual freedoms according to na article posted at newswithviews.com.
——————————————————————————————————–
Fair Use Snippet, Complete article here
AMERICA: FREEDOM’S
GREATEST THREAT
By Pastor Chuck Baldwin
July 27, 2007
NewsWithViews.com
Most of us who believe in the free enterprise system have been taught that business interests normally work to the betterment of America’s overall health, both commercially and politically. While there might have been a time when this was true, it is definitely not true today. Not only has Big Business become unfriendly to the principles of freedom, it has also become freedom’s greatest threat.
——————————————————————————————————–
Fair Use Snippet, Complete article here
Someone rightly observed that one can determine the focus of, and influence upon, societies by analyzing its architecture. For example, from the founding of Jamestown in 1607 through the beginning of the War for Southern Independence, the most notable buildings (in most communities) belonged to churches. From the mid-nineteenth century to the mid-twentieth century, the most prominent buildings belonged to various governments. From the mid-twentieth century to the present, the biggest, most lavish, and most notable buildings belong to Big Business. This is not accidental or coincidental. These buildings are the monuments of men to the ideas that mean the most to them. Accordingly, a vast number of today’s Americans have come to worship at the shrine of Big Business.
However, this idolatry comes at great price. Not the least of which is the way we have allowed Big Business interests to virtually control governmental policy, including our war and defense policies.
For example, I recently obtained a copy of the U.S. Navy’s “Playbook.” This Playbook succinctly summarizes the Department of the Navy’s policies and guidelines, and is made available to naval officers and to public affairs professionals. Under the section entitled “Vision” it states, “Americans secure at home and abroad; sea and air lanes open and free for the peaceful and productive movement of international commerce; enduring national and international naval relationships that remain strong and true; steadily deepening cooperation among the maritime forces of emerging partner nations . . .”
——————————————————————————————————–
Fair Use Snippet, Complete article here
Consider, too, the way that the Chambers of Commerce around America attempt to facilitate the flow of illegal aliens into our country. In fact, the national Chamber of Commerce is one of the biggest proponents of amnesty for illegal aliens. Many within Corporate America also support “sanctuary cities” for illegal aliens. They lobby our congressmen in Washington, D.C., and in state capitols to NOT enforce our nation’s laws against companies that hire illegals and against illegals themselves.
Anyone with even a modicum of common sense understands that nothing compromises America’s safety and security as does the current invasion of our country by illegal aliens. How anyone can believe that President Bush is serious about fighting a “war on terror” when he has done absolutely nothing for nearly six years to secure our borders and ports is the height of naïveté.
——————————————————————————————————–
Fair Use Snippet, Complete article here
Look, too, at how Big Business tries to manipulate laws regarding the right to keep and bear arms. One of the chief proponents of denying people the right to transport firearms in their vehicles to and from work is Corporate America. All over the country, companies threaten their employees with dismissal should they have firearms in their cars. In fact, it is the diabolical duo of Big Business and Big Government that are the biggest proponents of denying the American people their right to personal self-defense.
Speaking of personal self-defense, if you own a firearm and intend to have ammunition to put in that firearm, you might want to buy it while you can afford it. By the first of next year, the price of ammunition will be at least double what it is today, that is providing one can find it at all. The reason? Corporate America is selling the raw ingredients necessary for the construction of ammunition (at top dollar, I might add) to Red China. As with everything else, Corporate America would rather sell to Communist China than to the American people.
Another sign of Corporate America’s treachery: just last Tuesday (July 24, 2007), Westinghouse Electric Company signed a deal to build four nuclear power plants in China and to transfer technology for its newest reactor to a Chinese partner. According to Westinghouse president, Steve Tritch, the Chinese nuclear plant deal is worth “multibillion-dollar contracts.” But the Chinese buyers asked the company not to disclose details. (Source: the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette) Just like we will never be told why China is buying up all the raw materials that go into making ammunition.
——————————————————————————————————–
(Coral Snake) One really has to ask WHY our great “free Enterprise” corporations are arming DEPOPULATIONIST COMMUNIST CHINA while doing everything they can to disram US.
If there is anything worse than our “Free Enterprise” (read New World Order FASCIST) corporations that are actually FASCIST it is our “Public” (read GOVERNMENT) school system. Most parents think that the public school system is designed to make knowledgeable people ready to function in a free civilization out of them. NOTHING CAN BE FURTHER FROM THE TRUTH.
The TRUTH is that the public education is designed to make OBEDIENT SHEEPLE for the NEW WORLD ORDER out of your children. Disobedience is often treated with drugs to produce the docile sheeple state that the public schools are after in students. If that doesn’t work than detention punishments designed to create “accidental” pants wettings and other humiliating embarrassing situations designed to make the student submit meekly to “sheepleing” become the order of the day. Furthermore because of “political correctness” privileges for population groups called “minorities” and girls these punishments are more likely to fall on Caucasian boys according to an article at rense.com:
——————————————————————————————————–
Bite Two > “Public” (Read GOVERNMENT) Education


If there is anything worse than our “Free Enterprise” (read New World Order FASCIST) corporations that are actually FASCIST it is our “Public” (read GOVERNMENT) school system. Most parents think that the public school system is designed to make knowledgeable people ready to function in a free civilization out of them. NOTHING CAN BE FURTHER FROM THE TRUTH.
The TRUTH is that the public education is designed to make OBEDIENT SHEEPLE for the NEW WORLD ORDER out of your children. Disobedience is often treated with drugs to produce the docile sheeple state that the public schools are after in students. If that doesn’t work than detention punishments designed to create “accidental” pants wettings and other humiliating embarrassing situations designed to make the student submit meekly to “sheepleing” become the order of the day. Furthermore because of “political correctness” privileges for population groups called “minorities” and girls these punishments are more likely to fall on Caucasian boys according to an article at newswithviews.com:
——————————————————————————————————–
Fair Use Snippet, Complete article here:
ZERO TOLERANCE A ONE
WAY STREET FOR PUBLIC
SCHOOLS
Posted 1:00 AM Eastern
by Jim Kouri
June 16, 2007
© 2007 NewsWithViews.com
A growing number of Americans believe that the US government school system has declared war on white, male students. In fact, many believe that young boys are treated more harshly than teachers who sexually exploit children.
While Americans are constantly told about “zero tolerance” for misbehavior in public schools, they are witnessing zero tolerance exclusively for youngsters who happen to be white males, according to critics of public education.
——————————————————————————————————–
Fair Use Snippet, Complete article here:
For example, according to a story in NBC10, 11-year old Matt Porter was singled out for ridicule during an awards ceremony at the Decatur Intermediate Learning Center in Pennsylvania. The sixth-grader received “Most Likely Not To Have Children” and “Sir Clowns-a-Lot” awards from two teachers at his school.
“Words cut deeper than any knife could. They hurt,” Porter’s stepfather, Joseph Sims, told a reporter from WCAU news in Philadelphia.
“When you hurt a child like that, you not only hurt him mentally, but it does hurt physically because you withdraw within yourself. That is what Matthew has done,” said Mr. Sims.
“Matt was humiliated by teachers who would never dare give such certificates to black or Hispanic children, or to female students,” said conservative activist Mike Baker.
“If black kids were given such certificates, you better believe heads would roll in that school district,” said Baker.
——————————————————————————————————–
Fair Use Snippet, Complete article here:
Mike Baker is more blunt in his criticism of government schools. “For years public school administrators have worked to achieve their political ambitions including global one-world socialism. They believe in order to achieve their goals they must single out and destroy America’s white males, especially the white males who’ll become the leaders, soldiers and police officers of tomorrow,” he said.
——————————————————————————————————–
(Coral Snake to the “Liberals”, SOCIALISTS and NEW WORLD ORDER pushers of other stripes who might be reading this) Do NOT think that because I used this article for the bite on “public” education that I’m sone racist who believes that the humiliation punishments and pills in the system should be used against “minirities” rather than whites. I STRONGLY dissapprove of your use of humiliation based sheepleizing punishments and DEPOPULTION POISONS like Ritalin being used against ANYBODY regardless of race, religion, national origin, gender or “sexual orientation”. This is why i firmly support home schooling and other alternative models to your “public education” system.
——————————————————————————————————–
——————————————————————————————————–
Bite Three > George W. Bush (aka Shrub, Shrubbie, Shrubya, Smirk, Smirking Chimp, Chimperor, *) / Dick Cheney


The administration of Shrubya Bush and Dick Cheney has always acted outside the Constitution in their war, spying and Illegal Immigration / North American Union promulgating activities. However with his two term limit in the presidency rapidly approaching an end the time has come again just like with the final years of the equally now oriented Clinton administration to start thinking “Will George W. Bush be the president to keep the throne through a declaration of “emergency” or Martial Law????!!!!!” In favor of this idea we know that Shrubya Bush is a far more “military” solution oriented president than Slick Willy Clinton ever was and that he has grossly violated the constitution before in matters of war, surveillance, illegal immigration and treaty making (the North American Union). He was even known to have referred to the Constitution as a G** D***** piece of paper!!!!! (this taking of the name of GOD in vain coming from someone claiming to be a CHRISTIAN!!!) An Article at rense.com speculates on this possibility:
——————————————————————————————————–
Fair Use Snippet, Complete article here:
- Martial Law Threat Is Real
By Dave Lindorff
7-27-7 -
- The looming collapse of the US military in Iraq, of which a number of generals and former generals, including former Chief of Staff Colin Powell, have warned, is happening none too soon, as it my be the best hope for preventing military rule here at home.
- From the looks of things, the Bush/Cheney regime has been working assiduously to pave the way for a declaration of military rule, such that at this point it really lacks only the pretext to trigger a suspension of Constitutional government. They have done this with the active support of Democrats in Congress, though most of the heavy lifting was done by the last, Republican-led Congress.
——————————————————————————————————–
Fair Use Snippet, Complete article here:
Meanwhile, last October Bush and Cheney, with the help of a compliant Congress, put in place some key elements needed for a military putsch. There was the overturning of the venerable Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, which barred the use of active duty military inside the United States for police-type functions, and the revision of the Insurrection Act, so as to empower the president to take control of National Guard units in the 50 states even over the objections of the governors of those states.
- Put this together with the wholly secret construction now under waycourtesy of a $385-million grant by the US Army Corps of Engineers to Halliburton subsidiary KBR Incof detention camps reportedly capable of confining as many as 400,000 people, and a recent report that the Pentagon has a document, dated June 1, 2007, classified Top Secret, which declares there to be a developing insurgency within the U.S, and which lays out a whole martial law counterinsurgency campaign against legal dissent, and you have all the ingredients for a military takeover of the United States.
——————————————————————————————————–
Fair Use Snippet, Complete article here:
- Bruce Fein isnt an alarmist. He says he doesnt see martial law coming tomorrow. But he is also realistic. He says, This is all sitting around like a loaded gun waiting to go off. I think the risk of martial law is trivial right now, but the minute there is a terrorist attack, then it is real. And it stays with us after Bush and Cheney are gone, because terrorism stays with us forever. (It may be significant that Hillary Clinton, the leading Democratic candidate for president, has called for the revocation of the 2002 Authorization for Use of Military Force against Iraq, but not of the earlier 2001 AUMF which Bush claims makes him commander in chief of a borderless, endless war on terror.)
- Indeed, the revised Insurrection Act (10. USC 331-335) approved by Congress and signed into law by Bush last October, specifically says that the president can federalize the National Guard to suppress public disorder in the event of national disorder, epidemic, other serious public health emergency, terrorist attack or incident. That determination, the act states, is solely the presidents to make. Congress is not involved.
- ——————————————————————————————————–
——————————————————————————————————–
Bite Four > Gun Guys
Finally to round out the first Bites to be served from the new central site at wordpress.com here is this week’s WORST from www.gunguys.com/
——————————————————————————————————–
Shoot Machine Guns, Raise Money for Republicans
From the New Hampshire Union Leader:
“Tired of the usual chicken dinners, the Manchester Republican Committee is planning to arm supporters next month with Uzis, M-16 rifles and other automatic weapons for a day of target practice at a Pelham firing range” at their next party fundraiser.
As if it wasn’t already obvious how much the gun lobby is in bed with the Republican Party, this “machine gun shoot out” on August 5th makes it crystal clear.
Isn’t it so interesting how overweight, middle-aged white guys like to pretend they’re important. How sad their lives must be to prove their “manliness” by shooting a machine gun. How sad is your existence — your day to day boring life — that a machine gun shoot makes your whole summer. That way, you can fantasize what it would be like to fight in a war — not that many of the attendees have ever been in one. Not that these “tough guys” even have a clue what violence and war actually look like.
We wonder if there is any correlation between the attendees weight and the number of rounds they hope to fire? Hopefully they can just sit back and plunk away. Doing any kind of physical exertion or running up a hill with an Uzi might be too much.
Chris Pappas, the city Democratic party chairman, called the event “not just in poor taste; it is downright offensive.”
“The citizens of Manchester have lived through a deadly spike in violent crime the past year-and-a-half, despite the campaign promises of (Mayor) Frank Guinta to lower crime rates,” Pappas said. “That the mayor’s political party would seek to glorify the use of machine guns for political gain is unconscionable.”
But this is where it gets really good:
Twenty safety experts, called “range officers,” will be on hand to load the guns and monitor the shooters….”My first and foremost goal is that everybody who walks in walks out,” Thibodeau said.
Um, we’re pretty sure you won’t get killed at our machine gun fundraiser, but……..you never know.
——————————————————————————————————–
Lessons from Canada: Human factor transcends dogma in gun debate
A column in today’s paper, “The Star” in Toronto, took aim at Canada’s conservative Prime Minister Stephen Harper who seems to suffer from an empathy deficit, or is at least selective. “Empathy and this prime minister are mostly strangers,” said the author James Travers.
“That same cold mix of political calculation and ideological certainty is evident when Conservatives balk at gun controls. Reversing Liberal policies and playing to a core constituency are more compelling than the now serialized stories of shootings and senseless death…
Instead the discussion turns on the freedom of the individual to own something private citizens don’t need and society can’t reasonably afford. As is surprisingly often the case with a government led by an unusually cerebral prime minister, it’s an emotional argument about symbols that tilt to partisan advantage and away from sound public policy.”
Ah, there’s the rub. We have two thoughts.
1) Gun Guys believes that guns are powerful symbols used — and abused — more for politics and identity than for shooting.
A book review of Joan Burbick’s stellar book, “Gun Show Nation” stated it clearly:
“In the war of symbols, guns reign supreme in America – meaning, owning a gun says more about your politics than how you use it. ….. The symbolic meaning of owning a gun is to reclaim political power, demonize minorities, distort the issue of crime in America, express contempt for women gaining access to power, and distract Americans from the real issues of democracy.”
2) No public policy debate about public safety, crime, and obviously guns and violence should ever be removed from the “human factor”. The “gun guys” toggle between emotion versus reason depending on their agenda. But gun violence prevention advocates who have good, reasonable policies should also never cede the “human factor’ when debating the gun issue.
Yes, on some level, public policy is inherently sterile. But no government or legislation should ever remove the real world impact of policies, especially pertaining to gun violence, from the equation.
Gun advocates fear the power and voice of gun violence victims because their personal stories inherently turn their contrived theories of “guns as protection” on its head.
Gun advocates prefer to play on their own turf — a sterile, theoretical debate — and live in a disconnected reality of symbols, wrapping themselves in their guns, god, and flag.
Symbols are powerful stuff. They cloud reality and push out the real world impact of too many guns in a culture or nation.
We hope that one day we will acknowledge that a gun is just a gun — we simply project our own values and identities onto them. That would be a giant leap towards curing our “empathy deficit.”
Guns don’t shoot symbols — they kill real life people
——————————————————————————– (Coral Snake) I believe that this attitude of connecting guns with sex more shows the fear and sexual perversion of the GUN GRABBERS, not the gun owners. ——————————————————————————————————–
From www.gunguys.com
Holding Military Style Assault Rifle, MI Gun Owner Asks Presidential Candidates on CNN YouTube Debate “If Our Babies Are Safe.”
On last night’s CNN YouTube debate between the democratic presidential candidates, Jered Townsend from Clio, Michigan submitted this question:
To all the candidates, tell me your position on gun control, as myself and other Americans really want to know if our babies are safe.
This is my baby, [holding up a deadly, military style assault rifle] purchased under the 1994 gun ban. Please tell me your views.
Thank you
Unfortunately, only two of the candidates got the chance to answer the question, Governor Bill Richardson (NM) and Senator Joseph Biden (DE). We would have loved to hear all of the candidates articulate their position on assault weapons. Whether they stand by America’s first responders and law enforcement officers or whether they cower to the extremist ideology of the gun lobby that believes criminals, gun traffickers, and terrorists should also have deadly military style weapons.
(Note: GunGuys.com does not endorse or support any presidential candidate from either party, or for any candidate for elected office).
Not to forget that one in five law enforcement officers slain in the line of duty are killed with assault weapons according to the Violence Policy Center’s landmark study “Officer Down: Assault Weapons and the War on Law Enforcement.”
From CNN’s transcript, scroll down to the bottom:
COOPER: Governor Richardson, you have one of the highest NRA ratings.
RICHARDSON: The issue here, I believe, is instant background checks.
RICHARDSON: Nobody who has a criminal background or is mentally ill should be able to get a weapon. That is the key, and that includes gun sales. That includes gun sales at gun shows.
The key is going to be also attacking poverty, bringing people together, dealing with those kids in the ghettos that are heavy users of gun violence and they are victims of gun violence, to make sure that this country attacks the core problems of poverty, having child care, bringing parents together.
COOPER: Senator Biden, are you going to be able to keep his baby safe?
BIDEN: I’ll tell you what, if that is his baby, he needs help.
(APPLAUSE)
I think he just made an admission against self-interest. I don’t know that he is mentally qualified to own that gun. I’m being serious. Look, just like me, we go around talking about people who own guns. I am the guy who originally wrote the assault weapons ban, that became law, and then we got defeated and then Dianne Feinstein went to town on it and did a great job.
BIDEN: Look, we should be working with law enforcement, right now, to make sure that we protect people against people who don’t — are not capable of knowing what to do with a gun because they’re either mentally imbalanced and/or because they have a criminal record, and…
COOPER: Time.
BIDEN: Anyway…
(APPLAUSE)
COOPER: We got one more question. Before…
BIDEN: … I hope he doesn’t come looking for me.
(LAUGHTER)
We’re not laughing. Not one bit
——————————————————————————————————–
More Next Week!
——————————————————————————————————–